Counter Strike Confederation - ChelsBells307559 Questions

7:28 PM

@YC | ChelsBells Response - Because I think I'm an objective arbiter that weighs both sides of a coin in order to make a fair decision. I think I can provide viewpoints that will ultimately make the rulebook better for all parties. I also believe weighing short and tong term pros and cons to changes and additions is vital, and I strive to achieve that as a player rep on the rules committee.

have you read the rules?

What edge do you think you have over the other people you are running against?

HG | PUMPKINSPICELATTE 🏆

have you read the rules?

It would be silly if not, right? I'm not gonna pretend I have the doc memorized but I've read it, sure

ATO | Assass1n

What edge do you think you have over the other people you are running against?

I have a broadcast and digital journalism degree from Syracuse University, continuously rated the best school in the country for journalists. Meaning I love the facts and how to see different perspectives. Being a rules arbiter means being able to see how something impacts everybody, and I think I have the necessary qualifications to do a good job at it.

would you be collaborating with the admins and mod team and weigh their input on certain things?

ATO | Assass1n

would you be collaborating with the admins and mod team and weigh their input on certain things?

Oh yeah for sure, ultimately it's a team effort to figure out the best ways to implement new or change current rules that will benefit the most amount of people